Lifeward (NASDAQ:LFWD – Get Free Report) and Grab (NASDAQ:GRAB – Get Free Report) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, dividends and analyst recommendations.
Profitability
This table compares Lifeward and Grab’s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.
| Net Margins | Return on Equity | Return on Assets | |
| Lifeward | -121.82% | -183.18% | -109.28% |
| Grab | 3.81% | 1.91% | 1.19% |
Analyst Recommendations
This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Lifeward and Grab, as reported by MarketBeat.com.
| Sell Ratings | Hold Ratings | Buy Ratings | Strong Buy Ratings | Rating Score | |
| Lifeward | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2.50 |
| Grab | 0 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 2.56 |
Volatility & Risk
Lifeward has a beta of 0.01, suggesting that its share price is 99% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Grab has a beta of 0.89, suggesting that its share price is 11% less volatile than the S&P 500.
Valuation and Earnings
This table compares Lifeward and Grab”s gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.
| Gross Revenue | Price/Sales Ratio | Net Income | Earnings Per Share | Price/Earnings Ratio | |
| Lifeward | $25.66 million | 0.50 | -$28.94 million | ($2.97) | -0.24 |
| Grab | $2.80 billion | 7.63 | -$105.00 million | $0.04 | 132.50 |
Lifeward has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Grab. Lifeward is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Grab, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Insider and Institutional Ownership
26.8% of Lifeward shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.5% of Grab shares are held by institutional investors. 2.7% of Lifeward shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of Grab shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.
Summary
Grab beats Lifeward on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.
About Lifeward
ReWalk Robotics Ltd., a medical device company, designs, develops, and commercializes technologies that enable mobility and wellness in rehabilitation and daily life for individuals with physical and neurological conditions in the United States, Europe, the Asia-Pacific, and internationally. It offers ReWalk personal exoskeleton and rehabilitation exoskeleton devices; ReStore, a soft exo-suit intended for use in the rehabilitation of individuals with lower limb disability due to stroke; AlterG Anti-Gravity System for use in physical and neurological rehabilitation and athletic training; MyoCycle devices; and ReBoot, a personal soft exo-suit for home and community use by individuals post-stroke. The company markets and sells its products directly to institutions and individuals, as well as through third-party distributors. The company was formerly known as Argo Medical Technologies Ltd. ReWalk Robotics Ltd. was incorporated in 2001 and is headquartered in Yokneam Illit, Israel.
About Grab
Grab Holdings Limited engages in the provision of superapps in Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam. The company offers its Grab ecosystem, a single platform with superapps for driver- and merchant-partners and consumers, that allows access to mobility, delivery, digital financial services, and enterprise sector offerings. Grab Holdings Limited is headquartered in Singapore.
Receive News & Ratings for Lifeward Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Lifeward and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
